首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   5篇
  免费   0篇
  2016年   2篇
  2014年   1篇
  2006年   1篇
  2002年   1篇
排序方式: 共有5条查询结果,搜索用时 93 毫秒
1
1.
人类认识的本质是一种观念的建构,它包括反映性认识和价值性认识。相应地,创造活动的本质就是改变已有的观念建构,它包括反映性创造和价值性创造。  相似文献   
2.
马克思主义认为认识论是一个复杂的认知体系。在这其中认识的主体、客体以及认识中介等因素都发挥着极为重要的作用,忽视任何一个因素都会违背马克思主义认识论的基本原则。教科书体系中的认识论问题,是建立在一种前康德的存在论基础上的,它没有经过康德的认识论转折,有着明显的主体性倾向和机械论色彩,这极其不利于学生形成正确的认识观。  相似文献   
3.
案例教学法的认识论分析   总被引:5,自引:0,他引:5  
案例教学法是不同于传统的讲授式的教学方法,它遵循了从现象到本质,从感性认识到理性认识的认识规律;实现了学生由认知客体向认知主体的转变;其逻辑方法的本质是假说———演绎法,其机制是共同体内的讨论。论文分析了案例教学法中存在的问题,并提出了提高案例教学法效果的建议。  相似文献   
4.
立足减少火灾对人类的危害 ,从哲学的视角剖析火灾形成的认识论基础。主要从自然观、人类实践行为、人的消费观念及价值取向进行全面论述 ,揭示当代火灾形成的直接原因、社会因素和思想根源。  相似文献   
5.
What if claims about the future informed us about the intentions and the capabilities of our opponents to wage war against ourselves? Would and should the existing norms that restrict the preventive use of force change in the wake of such transformation? This article highlights the potential normative consequences of this change and discriminates between several possible normative evolutions. Would and should the “knowability of the future” alter radically the traditional rule of self-defense? This rule could indeed be jeopardized but, as I argue in this paper, it should not (and might not necessarily). However, the distinction between preemption and prevention could become obsolete. Future claims about security will also induce new security doctrines as knowledge about the future would be used to signal one’s intentions and deter one’s opponent. This change would also have a significant impact on accountability, as citizens would have a more active role in discussions over foreign policy. Moreover, new modes of predictions and forecasting will challenge the traditional role of experts whose biases have hampered their analyses and anticipations. Thus, trustworthy future claims could bring significant progress in both ethical and political terms as they would trigger a debate on the role of knowledge in democratic societies.  相似文献   
1
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号