全文获取类型
收费全文 | 105篇 |
免费 | 12篇 |
国内免费 | 5篇 |
出版年
2023年 | 1篇 |
2020年 | 6篇 |
2019年 | 8篇 |
2018年 | 4篇 |
2017年 | 8篇 |
2016年 | 2篇 |
2015年 | 1篇 |
2014年 | 10篇 |
2013年 | 18篇 |
2012年 | 5篇 |
2011年 | 7篇 |
2010年 | 5篇 |
2009年 | 4篇 |
2008年 | 3篇 |
2007年 | 3篇 |
2006年 | 4篇 |
2005年 | 3篇 |
2004年 | 6篇 |
2003年 | 2篇 |
2002年 | 3篇 |
2001年 | 6篇 |
2000年 | 1篇 |
1999年 | 1篇 |
1997年 | 1篇 |
1995年 | 1篇 |
1994年 | 2篇 |
1993年 | 1篇 |
1992年 | 1篇 |
1991年 | 2篇 |
1990年 | 3篇 |
排序方式: 共有122条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
41.
Ronald J Kurth Former President of the U.S. Naval War College 《战略研究杂志》2013,36(2):261-280
This article is a portrait of Admiral Sergei Gorshkov, commander of the Soviet Navy for almost three decades, from 1956–85. The author, a retired US Navy admiral with a Harvard PhD in Russian studies who served as both defense and naval attaché in Moscow, draws on numerous face-to-face interactions with Gorshkov. He also explores Gorshkov's memoirs that were published recently in Russia but have not appeared in an English translation. The paper is not only a first-hand account of an important historical figure, but also a window into the world of military-to-military diplomacy and intelligence during the Cold War. 相似文献
42.
43.
里程碑节点审查是美军装备采办过程中的核心控制手段。选取美军在该领域应用的最具代表性的项目成功可能性评审方法(Probability of Program Success,POPS)和项目支持评审方法(Program Support Review,PSR),围绕任务目标归纳出方法的主要思路,从程序步骤、评审内容框架等方面深入探究方法的特点,并从应用条件、使用范围、优点和局限性等方面进行对比分析,最后提出启示建议,为优化我军节点审查方法、提升装备采购过程管控能力提供借鉴和参考。 相似文献
44.
美军武装直升机电子战设备的现状与发展趋势 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
介绍了武装直升机在现代战场上面临的种种威胁,重点介绍了美军武装直升机目前装备的电子战设备和尚处于研制中的新一代综合性电子战设备,分析了美军武装直升机电子战设备的发展趋势。 相似文献
45.
Fe3+ 与S2 - 反应是一个典型的竞争反应 ,反应的生成物与反应条件有着非常密切的关系。通过理论研究和实验验证 ,确认在酸性介质中反应的生成物为Fe3+ 和单质S↓ ;在碱性介质中反应的生成物为黑色Fe2 S3↓。 相似文献
46.
47.
设X为一致凸的Banach空间,T:X(?)D(T)→X为m—增生的且强增生的算子,T_0:X→X为线性紧算子。C:X→X为全连续算子,应用Leray-Schauder度理论,研究了算子方程Tx-T_0x Cx=f,f∈X的可解性。 相似文献
48.
关于(S)_+型映射的一个区域不变定理及其应用 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
周海云 《军械工程学院学报》1992,(3)
本文运用拓扑度方法,获得一个关于(S)_+型映射的区域不变定理。作为它的应用,本文得到了扩张映射的满值性,从而部分地回答了著名数学家L.Nirenberg提出的一个关于扩张映射满值性的公开问题。 相似文献
49.
Amy F. Woolf 《The Nonproliferation Review》2013,20(3):499-504
The U.S. Congress, charged with overseeing U.S. nuclear weapons policy and programs, usually addresses such policies and programs through the annual authorization and appropriations process, focusing mostly on questions of how many and what types of weapons the United States should deploy, with little attention paid to questions about nuclear weapons strategy, doctrine, and policy. The oversight process has brought about some significant changes in the plans for U.S. nuclear weapons, including the elimination of funding for the Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator study and the shift of that funding into a study of the Reliable Replacement Warhead. But with the focus on authorizations and appropriations, along with the divided jurisdiction over nuclear weapons policy and programs in congressional committees, Congress has not, either recently or during the Cold War and post–Cold War eras, conducted a more comprehensive review of U.S. nuclear weapons strategy, policy, or force structure. Changes in committee jurisdictions could affect the oversight process, but as long as nuclear weapons policy and programs remain a relatively low priority for most members of Congress, and the country at large, it is unlikely that Congress will pursue such a comprehensive debate. 相似文献
50.
William C. Potter 《The Nonproliferation Review》2013,20(2):343-354
U.S. nuclear export policy has undergone major transformations since 1945, and the most recent change, as expressed in the July 18, 2005, India-U.S. Joint Statement, represents an especially significant shift in policy. The document reverses more than a quarter century of U.S. declaratory policy, suggesting that the current U.S. administration regards nuclear proliferation to be both inevitable and not necessarily a bad thing. This article investigates this policy shift, looking at the history of U.S. nuclear export policy and the potential ramifications of the new policy on the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). The author also touches on the potential effects of the Joint Statement on Indian-Pakistani relations. Finally, it is suggested that it is not too late for India and the United States to change the new policy with more consideration for the NPT and the Nuclear Suppliers Group Initiative. 相似文献