一种改进的证据理论合成规则

随着证据理论在信息融合领域中的广泛应用,对冲突证据的处理成为证据理论和应用研究热点。提出了一种基于证据重要度和聚焦度的新的合成规则,首先根据各个证据的重要度对冲突证据进行修正,再对冲突进行细化并考虑证据焦元的基数对D-S合成法则的影响,将冲突信息提取后加入组合规则中。通过实验比较和分析,结果说明该方法不仅能够处理一般性冲突问题,也能处理"一票否决"和"鲁棒性"问题。     

前馈——模型参考自适应复合控制策略

由于多余力矩严重影响了电动负载模拟器的加载性能,提出了一种复合控制方法对该问题进行研究。首先考虑承载对象运动带来的干扰,建立了系统的数学模型;然后,针对控制系统单独采用前馈补偿或自适应控制方法的局限性,进行了基于前馈控制和模型参考自适应控制的复合控制系统设计,并利用Lyapunov函数的方法构造了自适应控制器。最后的仿真结果表明,采用复合控制方法能够大幅度消除电动负载模拟器的多余力矩,验证了控制策略的可行性。     

基于博弈论和灰色关联分析的雷达抗干扰评估

首先,将基于博弈论的组合权重确定方法引入到雷达抗干扰评估指标的权重确定之中,克服了单一方法确定权重的片面性。然后,介绍了灰色关联分析,对确定指标权重后的雷达抗干扰能力进行了综合评估。最后,利用所建方法对国外7部雷达的抗干扰能力进行排序,验证了模型的正确性。     

指控领域模块化本体开发方法

部队指控系统的广泛应用对指控训练提出更高要求。仿真系统开始越来越多地应用于训练中,为之提供真实的指控训练环境。部队模拟训练系统中实装指控系统与基于仿真的训练支撑环境的互操作性问题是一个急待解决的问题。指控领域本体用于对实装指控系统与基于仿真的训练支撑环境间命令、请求和报告等交互信息进行形式化语义描述,解决二者在语义层次的互操作性问题。指控领域模块化本体开发方法对现有开发方法进行了改进,更加符合本体构建原则,主要体现在指控领域模块化本体的量化评价和指控领域本体模块的集成这两个方面。     

基于多模型的模拟电路软故障诊断

针对电子装备模拟电路故障诊断过分依赖专业技术人员和诊断专家的不足,提出利用信息融合技术,综合极限学习机(ELM,Extreme Learning Machine)、支持向量机(SVM,Support Vector Machine)以及BP(Back Propagation)神经网络等智能故障诊断模型,对模拟电路软故障进行诊断的故障诊断方法。通过对不同模型分别输入不同频率的电压信号,得到每个模型的诊断结果;采用DS(Dempster-Shafe)证据理论对每个模型诊断结果的可信度进行评估,确立每个模型诊断结果的组合置信度。通过不同模型诊断结果的决策层融合,最终获得诊断结果。以某型装备滤波电路的故障诊断为例,多模型融合诊断结果的准确率比单一方法模型的诊断准确率有了明显的提高,证明了该方法的有效性。     

边检执勤执法风险评估制度的实践反思及理论建构

边检执勤执法风险评估是理论研究缺失下的制度实践,为避免出现“形式化”、“走过场”的弊病,亟须对其进行系统反思,并对风险评估制度的基本范畴、合理根基、合法来源、体系构成及目前实践中存在的问题以及改进的空间进行研究,在理论上构建并完善边检执勤执法风险评估制度,以进一步指导和完善边检机关风险评估工作实践。     

美国边防管理理念及其启示

美中两国作为世界上比较大的海陆兼备的国家,边防环境有着诸多相似之处.从边界管理外移、重视海防、实施差异化边界管理模式、注重科技防边等方面对美国边防管理理念进行分析,提出美国边防管理理念带给中国边防管理工作的启示：陆海并重,突出海防;区别对待;预防为主;科技管边。     

起重机吊重摆角的自适应神经网络补偿控制

为了控制起重机吊重摆动幅度在最短时间内衰减到规定范围或平衡点附近,同时考虑到由于外界不确定性因素导致的系统模型的不确定性,设计了自适应径向基函数Radial Basis Function（RBF）神经网络补偿控制器。RBF神经网络对系统模型的未知函数进行辨识,并将辨识信息提供给控制器。实验结果表明：吊重摆角约在5s时跟踪给定幅度的正弦信号,并在参考信号发生突变时,摆角仍在给定的范围内;RBF神经网络约在5s后几乎以零误差辨识未知函数。所设计的控制器对不确定性因素具有较强的鲁棒性,这也验证了控制系统稳定性证明结论。     

From control to parasitism

This article sets out to investigate the current paradoxical roles of border control agencies in order to contribute to the theoretical debate on border porosity and related security issues in West Africa. The colonial demarcation of African borders accounts for their porous nature initially, as borderland populations challenged the unjust scission of their cultural, economic, geographical and geopolitical spaces. However, new forms of porosity also evolved over time, masterminded by new actors. Drawing on the Ghana–Togo border case, and through interviews, observation and documentary analysis, this article argues that border control agencies are partly responsible for the current border porosity and attendant security problems as their jurisdiction has shifted to a multi-layered border parasitism. The article is not, however, an attack on border law enforcement agencies; rather it attempts to explore their roles in shielding the region, already exposed to terrorism and piracy, from further security threats.     

From adversity to prosperity

This article interrogates the continuing relevance of the contractarian governance paradigm to resource governance and the impact of exploitation on the local population and environment in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Zimbabwe and Ghana. It highlights the susceptibilities of their governance processes, particularly the roles of the elites of the host communities, the multinational corporations, and the governing authorities in appropriating resources for their personal interests, resulting in tensions and conflicts. This scenario is borne out of inept leadership, as well as the defective and compromised administrative mechanisms operational in these countries. In view of this, the article underscores the need for a ‘new governance management paradigm’ anchored on a communitarian framework, which incorporates all stakeholders, to guarantee sustainable peace and prosperity, particularly in conflict zones. The article therefore concludes that achieving a nexus between forestry, mining activities and economic development in these countries will require a restructuring of the existing governance mechanisms; and advocates for a new governance model capable of curbing the excesses of local and foreign hegemony, including a total overhaul of the seemingly compromised supervising authority.